home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- I recall being flamed rather severely by Ned Freed when I suggested
- that MIME was inadequate because the specification of format-types
- such as 'postscript' or 'gif' didn't specify enough about format
- versions, external resources used, etc.
-
- Many of his arguments were based on the practical difficulties of
- requiring any kind of additional standardization for document format
- versions in a distributed mail application.
-
- Now that MIME is out as a proposal for mail, I still believe that
- these problems should be addressed before MIME is appropriate for
- database, archival and retrieval applications. In addition, the
- current mechanism in MIME for external references suffers the same
- problem that other references mechanisms that are based on
- hostname/pathname have: files move, change in place, host names come
- and go over the years.
-
- Both these problems are not trival to solve, but I don't think they
- are unsolvable.
-
-